Today I went down to the 1 train platform at 168th Street in Manhattan to catch the train to 137th Street City College for a Summer class I’m taking. I really love the station. There’s something cool about the high, vaulted ceiling and the old ceiling mount where it looks like an electric chandelier used to hang. I can almost imagine how it used to look, and how it might look if the vaulted ceiling were renovated and covered with murals depicting New York City’s past. But, even if they never renovated it (except for structural repairs) there’s just something cool about a subway station that has street lamps and pedestrian bridges that go over the tracks.
So, it was with great disappointment that I discovered earlier today that the city is renovating the station. By renovating, I don’t mean they’re improving on the already dramatic and exceptional appearance of the subway station. They’re covering the vaulted ceiling with a low ceiling instead. After the space and atmosphere the platform had, the low hanging girders make the space feel extremely claustrophobic.
One end of the platform already has a low ceiling and I always avoided it, because the vaulted ceiling helped me forget that I was so far underground I had to take an elevator to get there. This station has no stairs or escalators.
I suppose they’ll close in the pedestrian bridge and make it look like any other subway station pedestrian tunnel, with those cheap, small, public-restroom-yellow tiles. They’ll cover the vaulted ceiling and replace it with something low and plain. They’ll cover up a part of New York City’s history instead of bringing it into focus.
What are they planning on doing with that extra space? Are they just going to turn it into storage? Or seal it off completely? Sometimes things have to be done for the sake of progress, but I just don’t see the point here. It’s not like they have to minimize the space to install air conditioning. This isn’t Singapore or Japan, after all, and our fares are barely enough to pay the top executives, let alone improve the system in any meaningful way.
I hope I’m wrong. I hope they’re just setting up those steel girders for safety while they renovate the ceiling and improve the station, but considering how big the girders are and how they perfectly align with the bottom of the pedestrian bridge, I’m sure I’m wrong. Instead of improving the transit system, the city is only making my commute worse by turning a vaulted and spacious station into a low-ceilinged, claustrophobia-inducing crevice in the earth that I will have to endure daily during my commute. Isn’t it enough already that there are no stairs or escalators and we’re forced to use elevators to get out of the station?
3 thoughts on “168th Street #1 Train Subway Station Renovations: Working Hard to Make NYC Worse?”
Thanks so much for this post. I am absolutely appalled at the ceiling that’s going in to cover the beautiful vaulted ceiling. So many times I’ve been there and tried to imagine how it would look if it were cleaned up. Also imagined music being composed especially for it, maybe by Paul Winter. How can we find out who’s responsible for this fiasco?
I have no idea, but the city could have done a dozen different things with this station that would have made it look amazing, including covering the ceiling with an amazing mosaic. Maybe “ugly” is cheaper, though. On the entry level where the service booth is, there is a placard that I think had an information number on it. It’s near the stairs that go down to the A and C trains.
Ugly may be cheaper — but solid steel beams aren’t that cheap. And the subway system has been able to spend quite a bit on mosaics and historic preservation in the past. There was warning of this in neighborhood papers — I’ll have to pay more attention.