I don’t know how many of you have read this book, but it was required reading for me in high school. Luckily, it was a book that I actually enjoyed, unlike quite a few Emily Bronte novels that I’d have happily thrown on Guy’s stack for burning.
The basic premise of Fahrenheit 451 is that, in the near future, books are illegal. Firemen, once used to put out fires (though that’s not known to the general public) are now used to start fires, specifically at the homes of people who are found to be harboring books illegally.
The story goes into a lot of detail about the breakdown of the fabric of society, the slow disintegration of the bonds between family members that keep the world functioning. It talks about ignorance and doing things just because that’s how they’ve ‘always’ been done. Then it talks about hope and enlightenment, in the form of Guy realizing that things don’t have to stay the same and he can and should make a change.
I won’t ruin the book for you, but if you haven’t read it, you should.
I was flipping through articles in my RSS reader and I hit on two posts, nearly back-to-back from The Next Web that sounded like they were pages from the book.
The first article is titled: “This Could Be Massive: Interactive TV…”
So, why did this stand out to me? Well, one of the future technologies in Fahrenheit 451 is a television system that is installed in place of walls in the living room. The television programs are completely 3D, completely immersive and completely interactive to the point that the show can not progress unless the viewer moves it along by saying the proper things at the proper times and interacting with what is known as “the family”. The flaw that the author was trying to express here is that these fake people, this fake “family”, draws so much attention away from real life and real family that it causes a breakdown between people. It’s almost like what’s happening now with so many women complaining that men spend more time with their computers and video game consoles than with them, but on a grander scale. TNW’s article went on to detail what could be the first step towards the four-walled TV “family” that Bradbury imagined. It’s both exciting and frightening, if you believe the potential consequences that Bradbury laid out in his book.
Just after that I saw another one of their articles titled “Love to read? Too busy? Brain Shots can help.”
The article goes on to discuss how Brain Shots has condensed books down to 10k words and they can be read via computer, e-reader and some mobile phones. Some have even gone extra simple and are available as audio books. In one part of Fahrenheit 451, when Guy starts questioning the established order and his Fire Chief figures out what’s going on in his head, the Chief tries to ‘save’ him by explaining to him how things became the way they were. Long story short, he said that people did it to themselves. People couldn’t be satisfied with reading real literature, books and stories with real value, or messages that explained deeper emotions and feelings. He said that eventually people started reading things in digests, then as blurbs and snippets, and eventually as 30 second blasts over the four-walled TVs. He asked how you could condense a classic work of literature into a 30 second blast and still retain it’s true meaning? Everything became dumbed down to keep everyone happy. To keep things exciting! I think Twitter is sort of a first step towards what Bradbury had imagined. How many of you that use Twitter know a Twitter wannabe pundit that tries to condense the feeling and emotion of a whole work of literature into 140 characters? And then, of course, there’s this article talking about Brain Shots, which is literally taking a page from Bradbury’s book. I wouldn’t be surprised if his book was their inspiration.
Technology is a beautiful thing, but I hope we keep using it wisely and effectively and don’t reduce our culture and our whole body of world literature into meaningless blasts of drivel that lose their true meaning. Bradbury’s book may have been written half a century ago, but it’s becoming more and more meaningful as time goes on.
A few interesting quotes from the book:
“Remember the firemen are rarely necessary. The public stopped reading of its own accord. You firemen provide a circus now and then at which buildings are set off and crowds gather for the pretty blaze, but its a small sideshow indeed, and hardly necessary to keep things in line. So few want to be rebels anymore. And out of those few, most, like myself, scare easily. Can you dance faster than the White Clown, shout louder than ‘Mr. Gimmick’ and the parlor ‘families’? If you can, you’ll win your way, Montag. In any event, you’re a fool. People are having fun.”
“It didn’t come from the Government down. There was no dictum, no declaration, no censorship, to start with, no! Technology, mass exploitation, and minority pressure carried the trick, thank God. Today, thanks to them, you can stay happy all the time, you are allowed to read comics, the good old confessions, or trade journals.”
This is definitely one of my favorite books.
Bradley Farless 
the book was gay.
LikeLike
the book was gay.
LikeLike
I love dystopian future novels and films! I think what you said about simply ignoring the books is actually part of the Fahrenheit 451 sotry. Take a look at the quotes there at the end of my post. You might not have reached that part if you're only halfway through, but in the story the public grew less and less interested in books, leading to condensed version and more condensed versions until they were totally forgotten. You can see it happening already in real life. How many people actually enjoy reading nowadays, compared to the total population? Of those that do read, how many actually read books that are just trash fiction? Or even understand the themes in classic works?Glad you enjoyed my post!
LikeLike
I love dystopian future novels and films! I think what you said about simply ignoring the books is actually part of the Fahrenheit 451 sotry. Take a look at the quotes there at the end of my post. You might not have reached that part if you're only halfway through, but in the story the public grew less and less interested in books, leading to condensed version and more condensed versions until they were totally forgotten. You can see it happening already in real life. How many people actually enjoy reading nowadays, compared to the total population? Of those that do read, how many actually read books that are just trash fiction? Or even understand the themes in classic works?Glad you enjoyed my post!
LikeLike
I'm in the middle of rereading it, and I have to say that I am having the same thoughts as you. I've read a whole bunch of dystopian future novels, and really F451 has gotten some of the things exactly right. The only thing that it won't get exactly right is the burning books part. It's too easy to simply ignore the books. There is no need for fire.
LikeLike
I'm in the middle of rereading it, and I have to say that I am having the same thoughts as you. I've read a whole bunch of dystopian future novels, and really F451 has gotten some of the things exactly right. The only thing that it won't get exactly right is the burning books part. It's too easy to simply ignore the books. There is no need for fire.
LikeLike
what you just said is reminiscent also of my country centuries ago when it was under colonization by the Spaniards. They controlled the medium and also prevented the general population from learning their language. The Spaniards thought that if we learned Spanish, we would be able to also to know their hidden agenda and this would trigger chaos and eventually revolution. They didnt want to educate majority of the Filipinos for fear they would know too much. Control can sometimes be beneficial. Its like the pill that seem bitter but has to be taken. It all boils down to what the objective is though. NK is always thought of as the sad example of where the restriction is just too exaggerated. People are just simply robbed off their nature to think for themselves.
LikeLike
what you just said is reminiscent also of my country centuries ago when it was under colonization by the Spaniards. They controlled the medium and also prevented the general population from learning their language. The Spaniards thought that if we learned Spanish, we would be able to also to know their hidden agenda and this would trigger chaos and eventually revolution. They didnt want to educate majority of the Filipinos for fear they would know too much. Control can sometimes be beneficial. Its like the pill that seem bitter but has to be taken. It all boils down to what the objective is though. NK is always thought of as the sad example of where the restriction is just too exaggerated. People are just simply robbed off their nature to think for themselves.
LikeLike
North Korea is the best example of controlling a population through controlling what they think. If you limit what they can know, and falsify history and they have no way of verifying it, then you can effectively manage the population to do whatever you want. It also reminds me of some of the craziness that was going on in Japan prior to and during World War II.
LikeLike
North Korea is the best example of controlling a population through controlling what they think. If you limit what they can know, and falsify history and they have no way of verifying it, then you can effectively manage the population to do whatever you want. It also reminds me of some of the craziness that was going on in Japan prior to and during World War II.
LikeLike
i agree this is a good book. the gist is somewhat like the movie equilibrium. The books in Fahrenheit are seen as mind openers and people are not encouraged to think because of the government's seeming fear of a revolution or instability. Equilibrium on the other hand prevents people from having any emotions. hence destruction of anything that could provoke feelings is the norm. This is something like Martial Law to the extreme.
LikeLike
i agree this is a good book. the gist is somewhat like the movie equilibrium. The books in Fahrenheit are seen as mind openers and people are not encouraged to think because of the government's seeming fear of a revolution or instability. Equilibrium on the other hand prevents people from having any emotions. hence destruction of anything that could provoke feelings is the norm. This is something like Martial Law to the extreme.
LikeLike